USA v. Evaristo Reyes-Diaz
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [14-41181 Affirmed ] Judge: JLD , Judge: ECP , Judge: PRO Mandate pull date is 01/10/2017 for Appellant Evaristo Reyes-Diaz; granting motion for summary affirmance filed by Appellee USA [8285172-2]; denying motion to extend time to file appellee's brief filed by Appellee USA [8285172-3] [14-41181]
Case: 14-41181
Document: 00513803953
Page: 1
Date Filed: 12/20/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-41181
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 20, 2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
EVARISTO REYES-DIAZ,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:14-CR-416-1
Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Evaristo Reyes-Diaz raises
an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Gonzalez-Longoria, 831 F.3d
670 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 29, 2016) (No. 166259). In Gonzalez-Longoria, we held that 18 U.S.C. § 16(b), which defines a
crime
of
violence
when
incorporated
by
reference
into
U.S.S.G.
§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(C), is not unconstitutionally vague on its face in light of Johnson
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 14-41181
Document: 00513803953
Page: 2
Date Filed: 12/20/2016
No. 14-41181
v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). Id. at 672. Accordingly, the motion
for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension
of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?