USA v. Jaime Perez-Sanchez


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [14-41209 Dismissed as Frivolous ] Judge: EGJ , Judge: JEG , Judge: GJC Mandate pull date is 09/08/2015 for Appellant Jaime Isabel Perez-Sanchez; denying motion to appoint counsel filed by Appellant Mr. Jaime Isabel Perez-Sanchez [7879890-3]; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Scott Andrew Martin [7845906-2] [14-41209]

Download PDF
Case: 14-41209 Document: 00513159688 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-41209 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 18, 2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee Lyle W. Cayce Clerk v. JAIME ISABEL PEREZ-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:14-CR-946-1 Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jaime Isabel PerezSanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez-Sanchez has filed a response and a supplemental response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Perez-Sanchez’s responses. Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 14-41209 Document: 00513159688 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2015 No. 14-41209 We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, Perez-Sanchez’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?