USA v. Jaime Perez-Sanchez
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [14-41209 Dismissed as Frivolous ] Judge: EGJ , Judge: JEG , Judge: GJC Mandate pull date is 09/08/2015 for Appellant Jaime Isabel Perez-Sanchez; denying motion to appoint counsel filed by Appellant Mr. Jaime Isabel Perez-Sanchez [7879890-3]; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Scott Andrew Martin [7845906-2] [14-41209]
Case: 14-41209
Document: 00513159688
Page: 1
Date Filed: 08/18/2015
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-41209
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 18, 2015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
v.
JAIME ISABEL PEREZ-SANCHEZ,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:14-CR-946-1
Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jaime Isabel PerezSanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Perez-Sanchez has filed a response and a
supplemental response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Perez-Sanchez’s responses.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 14-41209
Document: 00513159688
Page: 2
Date Filed: 08/18/2015
No. 14-41209
We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, Perez-Sanchez’s motion for the
appointment of new counsel is DENIED, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?