USA v. Juan Castro-Castro


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [15-41722 Affirmed ] Judge: JLD , Judge: ECP , Judge: PRO Mandate pull date is 01/10/2017 for Appellant Juan Castro-Castro; granting motion for summary affirmance filed by Appellee USA [8287527-2]; denying motion to extend time to file appellee's brief filed by Appellee USA [8287527-3] [15-41722]

Download PDF
Case: 15-41722 Document: 00513804071 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-41722 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 20, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Lyle W. Cayce Clerk JUAN CASTRO-CASTRO, also known as Jorge Castro-Valdes, also known as Jorge Castro-Valdez, also known as Juan Jose Rivera-Castro, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:15-CR-661-1 Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Juan Castro-Castro raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Gonzalez-Longoria, 831 F.3d 670, 672 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 29, 2016) (No. 16-6259). In Gonzalez-Longoria, we held that 18 U.S.C. § 16(b), which defines a crime of violence when incorporated by reference into U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C), is not unconstitutionally vague on its face in light of Johnson Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 15-41722 Document: 00513804071 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016 No. 15-41722 v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension of time in which to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?