Lynn Rowell, et al v. Leslie Pettijohn
Filing
PUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [15-50168 Remanded] Judge: WED, Judge: RHB, Judge: JLD. Mandate pull date is 06/15/2017 [15-50168]
Case: 15-50168
Document: 00514007108
Page: 1
Date Filed: 05/25/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 15-50168
May 25, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
LYNN ROWELL, doing business as Beaumont Greenery; MICAH P.
COOKSEY; MPC DATA AND COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED;
MARK HARKEN; NXT PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED; PAULA COOK;
MONTGOMERY CHANDLER, INCORPORATED; SHONDA TOWNSLEY;
TOWNSLEY DESIGNS, L.L.C.,
Plaintiffs - Appellants
v.
LESLIE L. PETTIJOHN, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the
Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner of the State of Texas,
Defendant - Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In Rowell v. Pettijohn, 816 F.3d 73 (5th Cir. 2016), our court affirmed the
dismissal of appellants’ challenge to Texas’ Anti-Surcharge Law, which
prohibits merchants from imposing surcharges for credit-card purchases. We
held the law did not implicate the First Amendment’s free-speech protections
and was not unconstitutionally vague. Id. at 82, 84.
Case: 15-50168
Document: 00514007108
Page: 2
Date Filed: 05/25/2017
No. 15-50168
On 29 March 2017, the Supreme Court, in a similar matter, Expressions
Hair Design v. Schneiderman, 137 S. Ct. 1144 (2017), held speech was
regulated and remanded to the second circuit. As a result, the Court remanded
this matter to our court “for further consideration in light of Expressions Hair
Design”. Rowell v. Pettijohn, No. 15-1455 (U.S. Apr. 3, 2017).
Accordingly, this matter is REMANDED to district court for further
proceedings consistent with Expressions Hair Design.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?