USA v. Juan Franco-Villagrana
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [15-51225 Affirmed] Judge: TMR, Judge: PRO, Judge: JWE. Mandate pull date is 05/23/2017 for Appellant Juan Carlos Franco-Villagrana [15-51225]
Case: 15-51225
Document: 00513975809
Page: 1
Date Filed: 05/02/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 15-51225
Summary Calendar
FILED
May 2, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JUAN CARLOS FRANCO-VILLAGRANA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 2:15-CR-479-1
Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Juan Carlos Franco-Villagrana pleaded guilty to illegal reentry and was
sentenced to 46 months of imprisonment. He argues that the district court
erred
in
applying
the
crime-of-violence
enhancement
of
U.S.S.G.
§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) (2014) based on his prior Texas conviction for burglary of a
habitation.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 15-51225
Document: 00513975809
Page: 2
Date Filed: 05/02/2017
No. 15-51225
Section 30.02(a) of the Texas Penal Code is divisible, the state court
documents reflect that Franco-Villagrana violated § 30.02(a)(1), and a violation
of § 30.02(a)(1) constitutes generic burglary of a dwelling. See United States v.
Uribe, 838 F.3d 667, 670-71 (5th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 2017 WL 661924 (Mar.
20, 2017) (No. 16-7969); § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) & comment. (n.1(B)(iii)) (2014).
Accordingly, the district court did not err in applying the crime-of-violence
enhancement. See Uribe, 838 F.3d at 671.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?