USA v. Antonio Ramirez-Olvera

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-11210 Affirmed ] Judge: WED , Judge: LHS , Judge: SAH Mandate pull date is 07/03/2017; granting motion for summary affirmance filed by Appellee USA [8354716-2]; denying as moot motion to dismiss appeal filed by Appellee USA [8354716-3]; denying motion to extend time to file appellee's brief filed by Appellee USA [8354716-4] [16-11210]

Download PDF
Case: 16-11210 Document: 00513991568 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/12/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-11210 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 12, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANTONIO DE JESUS RAMIREZ-OLVERA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:14-CR-133-1 Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Antonio De Jesus Ramirez-Olvera appeals from the denial of a postconviction pleading in which he purported to reserve the right to challenge his conviction and sentence under Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). Ramirez-Olvera, in essence, sought 28 U.S.C. § 2255 relief. Thus, his pleading was an unauthorized successive § 2255 motion that the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain, and he has appealed from the denial of a Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-11210 Document: 00513991568 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/12/2017 No. 16-11210 meaningless motion. See United States v. Key, 205 F.3d 773, 774 (5th Cir. 2000); United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?