USA v. Rudy Lopez


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-11513 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: JES , Judge: EBC , Judge: GJC. Mandate pull date is 07/11/2017 for Appellant Rudy Lopez; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Peter Christian Smythe [8399372-2] [16-11513]

Download PDF
Case: 16-11513 Document: 00514041073 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-11513 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 20, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RUDY LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16-CR-122-12 Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Rudy Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-11513 Document: 00514041073 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2017 No. 16-11513 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?