USA v. Silton Goutreaux
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-11585 Affirmed] Judge: JLW, Judge: JLD, Judge: LHS. Mandate issue date is 12/21/2017 for Appellant Silton Russell Goutreaux [16-11585]
Case: 16-11585
Document: 00514253954
Page: 1
Date Filed: 11/29/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 16-11585
Summary Calendar
FILED
November 29, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
SILTON RUSSELL GOUTREAUX, also known as “Pretty Boy”,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:16-CR-111-2
Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Silton
imprisonment
Russell
for
methamphetamine.
Goutreaux
conspiracy
to
appeals
possess
his
188-month
with
intent
sentence
to
of
distribute
He argues that the district court’s calculation of the
amount of drugs that his offense involved rested on statements in the
presentence report (PSR) that lacked sufficient indicia of reliability. However,
Goutreaux fails to show that the information contained in the PSR was
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 16-11585
Document: 00514253954
Page: 2
Date Filed: 11/29/2017
No. 16-11585
materially untrue, inaccurate, or unreliable. See United States v. Harris, 702
F.3d 226, 229–31 (5th Cir. 2012). Goutreaux also challenges the two-level
firearm enhancement in U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1).
The district court’s
determination that the enhancement applies is a factual finding, which we
review for clear error. United States v. King, 773 F.3d 48, 52 (5th Cir. 2014).
Goutreaux fails to show that the finding was not plausible in light of the record
as a whole. See id.
AFFIRMED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?