USA v. Mauricio Reye
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-20051 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: JLD , Judge: ECP , Judge: PRO Mandate pull date is 01/10/2017 for Appellant Mauricio Lino Reyes; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Scott Andrew Martin [8208304-2] [16-20051]
Case: 16-20051
Document: 00513805479
Page: 1
Date Filed: 12/20/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-20051
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 20, 2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
v.
MAURICIO LINO REYES, also known as Mauricio Reyes, also known as
Mauricio Bonilla Reyes, also known as Antonio Bonilla-Reyes, also known as
Victor Escalante-Ramirez, also known as Mauricio L. Reyes, also known as
Cristobal Mendez-Bonilla, also known as Cristobal Mendez Bonilla, also
known as Antonio Bonilla,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:15-CR-554-1
Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mauricio Lino Reyes
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 16-20051
Document: 00513805479
Page: 2
Date Filed: 12/20/2016
No. 16-20051
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Reyes has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?