USA v. Mauricio Reye


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-20051 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: JLD , Judge: ECP , Judge: PRO Mandate pull date is 01/10/2017 for Appellant Mauricio Lino Reyes; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Scott Andrew Martin [8208304-2] [16-20051]

Download PDF
Case: 16-20051 Document: 00513805479 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-20051 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 20, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee Lyle W. Cayce Clerk v. MAURICIO LINO REYES, also known as Mauricio Reyes, also known as Mauricio Bonilla Reyes, also known as Antonio Bonilla-Reyes, also known as Victor Escalante-Ramirez, also known as Mauricio L. Reyes, also known as Cristobal Mendez-Bonilla, also known as Cristobal Mendez Bonilla, also known as Antonio Bonilla, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15-CR-554-1 Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mauricio Lino Reyes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-20051 Document: 00513805479 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016 No. 16-20051 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Reyes has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?