USA v. Julio Bocha
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-20446 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: CDK, Judge: JLD, Judge: GJC. Mandate pull date is 06/08/2017; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Mark Glendon Parenti [8399947-2] [16-20446]
Case: 16-20446
Document: 00513997769
Page: 1
Date Filed: 05/18/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-20446
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
May 18, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JULIO CESAR BOCHAS,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:01-CR-704-9
Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Julio Cesar Bochas has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Bochas has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We agree with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 16-20446
Document: 00513997769
Page: 2
Date Filed: 05/18/2017
No. 16-20446
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?