USA v. Charles London

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-31022 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: EGJ, Judge: JES, Judge: JEG. Mandate pull date is 06/20/2017 for Appellant Charles C. London; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Mark David Plaisance, Esq. [8383447-2] [16-31022]

Case: 16-31022

Document: 00514010701

Page: 1

Date Filed: 05/30/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-31022
Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit

FILED
May 30, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
CHARLES C. LONDON, also known as “C”,

Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana
USDC No. 3:15-CR-83-2
Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Charles C. London has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
London has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow
us to make a fair evaluation of London’s claim of ineffective assistance of

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*

Case: 16-31022

Document: 00514010701

Page: 2

Date Filed: 05/30/2017

No. 16-31022
counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to
collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein, as well as London’s response. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2