Granville Rose v. Camille Buras, et al


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-31171 Affirmed ] Judge: EGJ , Judge: PRO , Judge: CH Mandate issue date is 12/05/2017; denying motion to enjoin against enforcement of Judgment/Order filed by Appellant Mr. Granville Rose [8459616-2], denying motion for production of Tangible Objects filed by Appellant Mr. Granville Rose [8459490-2]; denying motion for stay pending appeal filed by Appellant Mr. Granville Rose [8459607-2] [16-31171]

Download PDF
Case: 16-31171 Document: 00514234886 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/13/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-31171 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 13, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk GRANVILLE ROSE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. CAMILLE BURAS; EDDIE JORDAN; AUTHER MOREL; FLOYD TRUHILL; MYRTLE GATHE THOMPSON; STACEY THOMPSON; LATOYA GATHE; LOUISIANA STATE; UNIDENTIFIED PARTIES; MARTIN REGAN; KARLA BAKER; ARIS COX; THOMAS CALOGERO; AARON RIVES; JAMES BUDDY CALDWELL, Attorney General, State of Louisiana, Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:15-CV-880 Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Granville Rose filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit against several defendants to raise several claims concerning his conviction for sexual battery. The district court dismissed the suit as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-31171 Document: 00514234886 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/13/2017 No. 16-31171 (1984), and denied the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion that Rose filed with respect to that judgment. Rose now appeals the district court’s denial of his Rule 60(b) motion, and he has also filed several motions with this court requesting various forms of relief. Rose has not shown that the district court abused its discretion by denying his Rule 60(b) motion. See Diaz v. Stephens, 731 F.3d 370, 374 (5th Cir. 2013). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, and all outstanding motions are DENIED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?