Granville Rose v. Camille Buras, et al
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-31171 Affirmed ] Judge: EGJ , Judge: PRO , Judge: CH Mandate issue date is 12/05/2017; denying motion to enjoin against enforcement of Judgment/Order filed by Appellant Mr. Granville Rose [8459616-2], denying motion for production of Tangible Objects filed by Appellant Mr. Granville Rose [8459490-2]; denying motion for stay pending appeal filed by Appellant Mr. Granville Rose [8459607-2] [16-31171]
Date Filed: 11/13/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
November 13, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
CAMILLE BURAS; EDDIE JORDAN; AUTHER MOREL; FLOYD TRUHILL;
MYRTLE GATHE THOMPSON; STACEY THOMPSON; LATOYA GATHE;
LOUISIANA STATE; UNIDENTIFIED PARTIES; MARTIN REGAN; KARLA
BAKER; ARIS COX; THOMAS CALOGERO; AARON RIVES; JAMES BUDDY
CALDWELL, Attorney General, State of Louisiana,
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 2:15-CV-880
Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Granville Rose filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit against several defendants
to raise several claims concerning his conviction for sexual battery.
district court dismissed the suit as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Date Filed: 11/13/2017
(1984), and denied the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion that Rose
filed with respect to that judgment. Rose now appeals the district court’s
denial of his Rule 60(b) motion, and he has also filed several motions with this
court requesting various forms of relief. Rose has not shown that the district
court abused its discretion by denying his Rule 60(b) motion. See Diaz v.
Stephens, 731 F.3d 370, 374 (5th Cir. 2013). The judgment of the district court
is AFFIRMED, and all outstanding motions are DENIED.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?