USA v. Oscar Reyna-Lozano
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-40086 Affirmed ] Judge: CDK , Judge: JLD , Judge: GJC Mandate pull date is 06/09/2017 for Appellant Oscar Reyna-Lozano; granting motion for summary affirmance filed by Appellee USA [8330729-2]; denying motion to extend time to file appellee's brief filed by Appellee USA [8330729-3] [16-40086]
Date Filed: 05/19/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
May 19, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:15-CR-1272-1
Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Oscar Reyna-Lozano appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty
plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation. He contends that the
district court erred in increasing his offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G.
§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) based on his prior Texas conviction for burglary of a
habitation under Texas Penal Code § 30.02. Reyna-Lozano argues, under
Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016), that the Texas burglary statute
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Date Filed: 05/19/2017
is not divisible and that not every violation of § 30.02(a) qualifies as a crime of
violence under § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii).
The Government has filed an opposed motion for summary affirmance
asserting that Reyna-Lozano’s arguments are foreclosed by our recent decision
in United States v. Uribe, 838 F.3d 667 (5th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 2017 WL
661924 (Mar. 20, 2017) (No. 16-7969). In the alternative, the Government
requests an extension of time in which to file a brief on the merits.
The Government is correct that Uribe forecloses Reyna-Lozano’s Mathis
argument. See Uribe, 838 F.3d at 669-71. Accordingly, the Government’s
motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an
extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district
court is AFFIRMED.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?