USA v. Salvador Guzman-Perez
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-40178 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: WED , Judge: LHS , Judge: SAH. Mandate pull date is 11/04/2016 for Appellant Salvador Bernardo Guzman-Perez; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Timothy William Crooks [8226811-2] [16-40178]
Case: 16-40178
Document: 00513718302
Page: 1
Date Filed: 10/14/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-40178
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 14, 2016
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
SALVADOR BERNARDO GUZMAN-PEREZ, true name Elvin Roy PerezLopez, also known as Luis Armando Guzman-Perez,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:15-CR-737-1
Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Salvador Bernardo
Guzman-Perez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Guzman-Perez has filed a response.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 16-40178
Document: 00513718302
Page: 2
Date Filed: 10/14/2016
No. 16-40178
reflected therein, as well as Guzman-Perez’s response.
We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?