USA v. Jose Balderas-Bueno
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-40303 Dismissed as Frivolous, 16-40313 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: JLD , Judge: ECP , Judge: PRO Mandate pull date is 01/10/2017 for Appellant Jose David Balderas-Bueno; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. H. Michael Sokolow [8207074-2] [16-40303, 16-40313]
Case: 16-40303
Document: 00513804766
Page: 1
Date Filed: 12/20/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-40303
c/w No. 16-40313
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 20, 2016
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSE DAVID BALDERAS-BUENO,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:15-CR-623-1
USDC No. 5:15-CR-1052-1
Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose David
Balderas-Bueno has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Balderas-Bueno has not filed a
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 16-40303
Document: 00513804766
Page: 2
Date Filed: 12/20/2016
No. 16-40303
c/w No. 16-40313
response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeals
present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?