USA v. Jamison Elli
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-40490 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: EGJ , Judge: LHS , Judge: SAH Mandate pull date is 04/17/2017 for Appellant Jamison Ross Ellis; denying motion to appoint counsel filed by Appellant Mr. Jamison Ross Ellis [8349050-3], denying motion to appoint counsel filed by Appellant Mr. Jamison Ross Ellis [8287524-2]; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Robert Gerard Arrambide, Esq. [8259243-2] [16-40490]
Date Filed: 03/27/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
March 27, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
JAMISON ROSS ELLIS,
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:14-CR-176-1
Before JOLLY, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jamison Ross Ellis
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ellis has filed a response, in which he requests new
appointed counsel. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make
a fair evaluation of Ellis’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Date Filed: 03/27/2017
therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review.
See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein, as well as Ellis’s response.
We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, Ellis’s motion for
appointment of new counsel is DENIED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?