USA v. Jaime Estrada-Monzon
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-40544 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: WED, Judge: LHS, Judge: SAH. Mandate pull date is 01/17/2017 for Appellant Jaime Luis Estrada-Monzon; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Shannon Charles Hooks [8295042-2]; denying motion to appoint counsel filed by Appellant Mr. Jaime Luis Estrada-Monzon [8320401-3] [16-40544]
Case: 16-40544
Document: 00513813366
Page: 1
Date Filed: 12/27/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-40544
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 27, 2016
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JAIME LUIS ESTRADA-MONZON,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:14-CR-1015-1
Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Jaime Luis Estrada-Monzon in the
appeal of his revocation sentence has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed
a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and
United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Estrada-Monzon has filed
a response and has moved for appointment of new counsel. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 16-40544
Document: 00513813366
Page: 2
Date Filed: 12/27/2016
No. 16-40544
as Estrada-Monzon’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, Estrada-Monzon’s motion for appointment of
counsel is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?