USA v. Ramon Resendez-Gonzalez
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-40818 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: EHJ , Judge: JLW , Judge: EBC Mandate pull date is 05/25/2017 for Appellant Ramon Resendez-Gonzalez; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Michael Lance Herman [8300190-2] [16-40818]
Case: 16-40818
Document: 00513979841
Page: 1
Date Filed: 05/04/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-40818
United States Court of Appeals
Fif h Circuit
FILED
May 4, 2017
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
RAMON RESENDEZ-GONZALEZ, also known as Ramon Gonzales
Resendez, also known as Ramon Gonzalez Resendez, also known as Ramon
Rezendez Gonzalez,
Defendant - Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:15-CR-25-1
Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ramon ResendezGonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Resendez-Gonzalez has filed a response. We
have reviewed counsel’s brief, Resendez-Gonzalez’s response, and the relevant
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 16-40818
Document: 00513979841
Page: 2
Date Filed: 05/04/2017
No. 16-40818
portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment
that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?