USA v. Ramon Resendez-Gonzalez


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-40818 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: EHJ , Judge: JLW , Judge: EBC Mandate pull date is 05/25/2017 for Appellant Ramon Resendez-Gonzalez; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Michael Lance Herman [8300190-2] [16-40818]

Download PDF
Case: 16-40818 Document: 00513979841 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/04/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-40818 United States Court of Appeals Fif h Circuit FILED May 4, 2017 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff - Appellee v. RAMON RESENDEZ-GONZALEZ, also known as Ramon Gonzales Resendez, also known as Ramon Gonzalez Resendez, also known as Ramon Rezendez Gonzalez, Defendant - Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 3:15-CR-25-1 Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ramon ResendezGonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Resendez-Gonzalez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief, Resendez-Gonzalez’s response, and the relevant Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-40818 Document: 00513979841 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/04/2017 No. 16-40818 portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?