USA v. Larry Boykin, Jr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-41096 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: CDK , Judge: CH , Judge: JEG Mandate pull date is 05/09/2017 for Appellant Larry Dane Boykin Jr.; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Frank Warren Henderson, Esq. [8344459-2] [16-41096]
Case: 16-41096
Document: 00513956507
Page: 1
Date Filed: 04/18/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-41096
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
April 18, 2017
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
v.
LARRY DANE BOYKIN, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:15-CR-35-1
Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Larry Dane Boykin,
Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Boykin has filed a response, but he did not challenge the
validity of his appeal waiver.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Boykin’s response.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 16-41096
Document: 00513956507
Page: 2
Date Filed: 04/18/2017
No. 16-41096
We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?