USA v. Ramon Carrillo-Hernandez

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-41202 Affirmed and Remanded] Judge: CDK, Judge: JWE, Judge: SAH. Mandate pull date is 09/06/2017 for Appellant Ramon Carrillo-Hernandez [16-41202]

Download PDF
Case: 16-41202 Document: 00514118763 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-41202 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 16, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RAMON CARRILLO-HERNANDEZ, also known as Cesar Garcia-Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:16-CR-110-1 Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ramon Carrillo-Hernandez pleaded guilty to being an alien unlawfully found in the United States after a previous deportation subsequent to an aggravated felony conviction. The district court sentenced him to 48 months of imprisonment and a three-year term of supervised release. At sentencing, the district court recommended that Carrillo-Hernandez participate in an alcohol abuse treatment program while in prison. The written judgment, Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-41202 Document: 00514118763 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2017 No. 16-41202 however, recommended that he participate “in an alcohol and/or drug abuse evaluation and treatment program.” Carrillo-Hernandez contends that the written judgment’s deviation from the oral pronouncement is a clerical error and asks this court to remand the case to the district court for a correction of the judgment under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. We AFFIRM and REMAND to the district court for correction of this clerical error. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36; United States v. Mudd, 685 F.3d 473, 480 (5th Cir. 2012). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?