USA v. Juan Guzman-Sanchez

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-41322 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: WED, Judge: LHS, Judge: SAH. Mandate pull date is 08/09/2017 for Appellant Juan Alberto Guzman-Sanchez; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. John Riley Friesell [8462655-2]; denying motion to appoint counsel filed by Appellant Mr. Juan Alberto Guzman-Sanchez [8474112-3] [16-41322]

Download PDF
Case: 16-41322 Document: 00514080688 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/19/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-41322 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 19, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN ALBERTO GUZMAN-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:09-CR-464-2 Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Juan Alberto Guzman-Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Guzman-Sanchez has filed a response, seeking appointment of counsel to assist with his appeal. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Guzman-Sanchez’s Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-41322 Document: 00514080688 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/19/2017 No. 16-41322 response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. GuzmanSanchez’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?