USA v. Jorge Posada-Guevara


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-41539 Dismissed as Frivolous, 16-41543 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: CDK , Judge: JLD , Judge: GJC. Mandate pull date is 07/19/2017 for Appellant Jorge Luis Posada-Guevara; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. H. Michael Sokolow [8420026-2] [16-41543, 16-41539]

Download PDF
Case: 16-41543 Document: 00514053186 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/28/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-41543 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 28, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Consolidated with 16-41539 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JORGE LUIS POSADA-GUEVARA, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:16-CR-452-1 USDC No. 2:16-CR-636-1 Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Luis PosadaGuevara has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-41543 Document: 00514053186 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/28/2017 No. 16-41543 c/w No. 16-41539 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Posada-Guevara has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Posada-Guevara’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?