USA v. Francisco Sanchez-Balli


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-41554 Dismissed as Frivolous 16-41559 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: EGJ , Judge: PEH , Judge: JWE Mandate pull date is 09/08/2017 for Appellant Francisco Sanchez-Balli; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Michael Lance Herman [8425751-2] [16-41554, 16-41559]

Download PDF
Case: 16-41554 Document: 00514123057 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-41554 c/w No. 16-41559 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 18, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. FRANCISCO SANCHEZ-BALLI, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:16-CR-565-1 USDC No. 1:11-CR-440-1 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco SanchezBalli has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sanchez-Balli has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-41554 Document: 00514123057 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2017 No. 16-41554 c/w No. 16-41559 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?