Rodney Hammond v. Norma Uriegas, et al
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-50984 Dismissed] Judge: TMR, Judge: PRO, Judge: JWE. Mandate pull date is 03/23/2017 [16-50984]
Case: 16-50984
Document: 00513894988
Page: 1
Date Filed: 03/02/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-50984
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
March 2, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
RODNEY J. HAMMOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
MELVIA LOVINGS; PAUL HELFRICH; MELISSA ESQUIVEL; AMELIA
BUSTOS; J&J WORLDWIDE SERVICES, INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 5:15-CV-579
Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant Rodney J. Hammond seeks to appeal the district court’s ruling
awarding defendants attorney fees.
The order was entered July 1, 2016.
Hammond was therefore required to file his notice of appeal by August 1, 2016.
On that day, he attempted to file the notice of appeal, but inadvertently filed a
document entitled “Plaintiff’s Response to Court’s Order to Show Cause.” The
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 16-50984
Document: 00513894988
Page: 2
Date Filed: 03/02/2017
No. 16-50984
next day, the court issued a “Deficiency Notice” informing him of the error. On
August 2, 2016, Hammond filed his notice of appeal.
Hammond’s notice of appeal was untimely, and this appeal must
therefore be dismissed.
See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A).
The unusual
circumstances surrounding Hammond’s late filing do not change this outcome.
Kinsley v. Lakeview Regional Medical Center LLC is squarely on point and
controls. See 570 F.3d 586, 590 (5th Cir. 2009).
DISMISSED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?