USA v. Hector Meza-Perez
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [16-51244 Dismissed as Frivolous in Part and in Part as Moot based on Meza-Perez's completion of his sentence. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); United States v. Heredia-Holguin, 823 F.3d 337, 340 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc)] Judge: EGJ, Judge: JES, Judge: JEG. Mandate pull date is 08/02/2017 for Appellant Hector Meza-Perez; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Bradford W. Bogan [8427369-2] [16-51244]
Case: 16-51244
Document: 00514069589
Page: 1
Date Filed: 07/12/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-51244
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
July 12, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
HECTOR MEZA-PEREZ,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 3:16-CR-947-1
Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hector Meza-Perez
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Meza-Perez has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 16-51244
Document: 00514069589
Page: 2
Date Filed: 07/12/2017
No. 16-51244
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5TH CIR. R. 42.2, and in part
as moot based on Meza-Perez’s completion of his sentence. See Spencer v.
Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); United States v. Heredia-Holguin, 823 F.3d 337,
340 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?