USA v. Dennis Lanza-Guillen

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [17-20105 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: CDK, Judge: PRO, Judge: SAH. Mandate issue date is 11/15/2017 for Appellant Dennis Alexis Lanza-Guillen; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Kayla R. Gassmann [8500720-2] [17-20105]

Download PDF
Case: 17-20105 Document: 00514207509 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/24/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 17-20105 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 24, 2017 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee Lyle W. Cayce Clerk v. DENNIS ALEXIS LANZA-GUILLEN, also known as Dennis Lanza, also known as Dennis Alexis Lanza Guillen, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16-CR-43-1 Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dennis Alexis Lanza-Guillen has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lanza-Guillen has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 17-20105 Document: 00514207509 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/24/2017 No. 17-20105 reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?