USA v. Dennis Lanza-Guillen
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [17-20105 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: CDK, Judge: PRO, Judge: SAH. Mandate issue date is 11/15/2017 for Appellant Dennis Alexis Lanza-Guillen; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Kayla R. Gassmann [8500720-2] [17-20105]
Case: 17-20105
Document: 00514207509
Page: 1
Date Filed: 10/24/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-20105
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 24, 2017
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
v.
DENNIS ALEXIS LANZA-GUILLEN, also known as Dennis Lanza, also
known as Dennis Alexis Lanza Guillen,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:16-CR-43-1
Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dennis Alexis
Lanza-Guillen has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lanza-Guillen has not filed a response.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 17-20105
Document: 00514207509
Page: 2
Date Filed: 10/24/2017
No. 17-20105
reflected therein.
We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?