USA v. Victor Huijon-Leon
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [17-20186 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: PEH , Judge: EHJ , Judge: JES Mandate issue date is 12/29/2017 for Appellant Victor Huijon-Leon; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. H. Michael Sokolow [8535242-2] [17-20186]
Case: 17-20186
Document: 00514264744
Page: 1
Date Filed: 12/07/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-20186
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 7, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
VICTOR HUIJON-LEON, also known as Victor Leon, also known as Rudolfo
Ruiz, also known as Victor Huijon Leon, also known as Victor R. Samora, also
known as Jose L. Huerta, also known as Victor Manuel Samora, also known as
Miguel Garcia, also known as Jose Leon,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:16-CR-511-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor Huijon-Leon
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Huijon-Leon has not filed a response. We have reviewed
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 17-20186
Document: 00514264744
Page: 2
Date Filed: 12/07/2017
No. 17-20186
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?