James Pietrangelo, II v. Sandusky Library, et al
Filing
9
ORDER filed to dismiss for want of prosecution for failure to pay the fee (MMD)
<![CDATA[
James Pietrangelo, II v. Sandusky Library, et al
Doc. 9
Case No. 10-4119 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ORDER JAMES E. PIETRANGELO, II Plaintiff - Appellant v. SANDUSKY LIBRARY; TERRI ESTEL; CITY OF SANDUSKY, OHIO; RICK BRAUN; KRIS PARSONS; JIM DOE Defendants - Appellees
Appellant having previously been advised that failure to satisfy certain specified obligations would result in dismissal of the case for want of prosecution and it appearing that the appellant has failed to satisfy the following obligation(s): The proper fee was not paid by November 2, 2010. It is therefore ORDERED that this cause be, and it hereby is, dismissed for want of prosecution. ENTERED PURSUANT TO RULE 45(a), RULES OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Leonard Green, Clerk
Issued: November 05, 2010
___________________________________
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
