Jeronique Cunningham v. Stuart Hudson


PER CURIAM OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The habeas petition is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. Decision for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt, Karen Nelson Moore, and Helene N. White, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 11-3005 Document: 174-1 Filed: 06/24/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: June 24, 2014 Mr. Michael J. Benza Law Office of Michael J. Benza 17850 Geauga Lake Road Chagrin Falls, OH 44023 Mr. Alan Michael Freedman Midwest Center for Justice P.O. Box 6528 Evanston, IL 60204 Mr. Thomas E. Madden Mr. Stephen E. Maher Office of the Ohio Attorney General 150 E. Gay Street, 16th Floor Columbus, OH 43215 Re: Case No. 11-3005, Jeronique Cunningham v. Stuart Hudson Originating Case No. : 3:06-cv-00167 Dear Counsel, The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case. Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Yours very truly, Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk Cathryn Lovely Deputy Clerk cc: Geri M. Smith Enclosures Mandate to issue.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?