Jeronique Cunningham v. Stuart Hudson

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The habeas petition is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. Decision for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt, Karen Nelson Moore, and Helene N. White, Circuit Judges.

Case: 11-3005

Document: 174-1

Filed: 06/24/2014

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: June 24, 2014
Mr. Michael J. Benza
Law Office of Michael J. Benza
17850 Geauga Lake Road
Chagrin Falls, OH 44023
Mr. Alan Michael Freedman
Midwest Center for Justice
P.O. Box 6528
Evanston, IL 60204
Mr. Thomas E. Madden
Mr. Stephen E. Maher
Office of the Ohio Attorney General
150 E. Gay Street, 16th Floor
Columbus, OH 43215
Re: Case No. 11-3005, Jeronique Cunningham v. Stuart Hudson
Originating Case No. : 3:06-cv-00167
Dear Counsel,
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Cathryn Lovely
Deputy Clerk
cc: Geri M. Smith
Enclosures
Mandate to issue.