USA v. Christopher Mateen

Filing

PER CURIAM OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The judgment of sentence is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the district court for resentencing with instructions to reconsider in the first instance whether Mateen s conviction for Gross Sexual Imposition triggers application of the statutory sentencing enhancement, consistent with the opinion of this court.decision for publication. R. Guy Cole, Jr., Chief Judge; Danny J. Boggs, Alice M. Batchelder, Karen Nelson Moore, Eric L. Clay (CONCURRING IN THE JUDGMENT), Julia Smith Gibbons, John M. Rogers, Jeffrey S. Sutton, Deborah L. Cook, David W. McKeague, Richard Allen Griffin, Raymond M. Kethledge, Helene N. White, Jane Branstetter Stranch, and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 12-4481 Document: 63-1 Filed: 08/26/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: August 26, 2014 Mr. Benjamin C. Glassman U.S. Attorney's Office 221 E. Fourth Street, Suite 400 Cincinnati, OH 45202 Mr. Kevin Michael Schad Federal Public Defender's Office 250 E. Fifth Street Suite 350 Chiquita Center Cincinnati, OH 45202 Re: Case No. 12-4481, USA v. Christopher Mateen Originating Case No. : 2:12-cr-00041-1 Dear Counsel, The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case. Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Yours very truly, Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk Cathryn Lovely Deputy Clerk cc: Mr. John P. Hehman Enclosures Mandate to issue.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?