Richard Wershe, Jr. v. Thomas Combs, et al
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The dismissal of Wershe s due-process claim is AFFIRMED, the dismissal of his Eighth Amendment claim is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. Decision for publication. Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING) and John M. Rogers, Circuit Judges; John T. Nixon, U.S. District Judge for the Middle District of Tennessee, sitting by designation.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
RICHARD WERSHE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
Aug 13, 2014
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
THOMAS COMBS, Chairperson, Michigan Parole Board;
BARBARA S. SAMPSON, Member, Michigan Parole Board,
in their official and individual capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Before: MOORE and ROGERS, Circuit Judges; NIXON, District Judge.
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was submitted on the
brief of the appellant without oral argument.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the dismissal of Wershe’s dueprocess claim is AFFIRMED, the dismissal of his Eighth Amendment claim is VACATED, and
the case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion
of this court.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?