Joshua Amerson v. Waterford Township, et al

Filing

OPINION: the district court erred when it determined that Stechly was entitled to summary judgment on the excessive-force claim. Accordingly, we REVERSE this ruling and REMAND for further proceedings on that claim. In all other respects, we AFFIRM, decision not for publication. Damon J. Keith, Circuit Judge; Eugene E. Siler , Jr., AUTHORING Circuit Judge and John M. Rogers, Circuit Judge.

Download PDF
Case: 13-1915 Document: 38-2 Filed: 04/15/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: April 15, 2014 Mr. Shawn C. Cabot Ms. Karen M. Daley Re: Case No. 13-1915, Joshua Amerson v. Waterford Township, et al Originating Case No. : 2:12-cv-10375 Dear Counsel, The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Laura A. Jones Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7023 cc: Ms. Amy Jean DeRouin Mr. T. Joseph Seward Mr. David J. Weaver Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?