Joshua Amerson v. Waterford Township, et al
Filing
OPINION: the district court erred when it determined that Stechly was entitled to summary judgment on the excessive-force claim. Accordingly, we REVERSE this ruling and REMAND for further proceedings on that claim. In all other respects, we AFFIRM, decision not for publication. Damon J. Keith, Circuit Judge; Eugene E. Siler , Jr., AUTHORING Circuit Judge and John M. Rogers, Circuit Judge.
<![CDATA[
Case: 13-1915
Document: 38-2
Filed: 04/15/2014
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk
Tel. (513) 564-7000
www.ca6.uscourts.gov
Filed: April 15, 2014
Mr. Shawn C. Cabot
Ms. Karen M. Daley
Re: Case No. 13-1915, Joshua Amerson v. Waterford Township, et al
Originating Case No. : 2:12-cv-10375
Dear Counsel,
The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Laura A. Jones
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7023
cc: Ms. Amy Jean DeRouin
Mr. T. Joseph Seward
Mr. David J. Weaver
Enclosure
Mandate to issue
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
