Christopher Armstrong v. Andrew Shirvell


OPINION filed: For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM IN PART, but REVERSE the district court s award of compensatory damages for false light invasion of privacy. We VACATE the district court s judgment and REMAND with instructions to enter judgment in Armstrong s favor for a total of $3.5million. Decision not for publication. Alan E. Norris, Karen Nelson Moore, and Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 13-2368 Document: 61-1 Filed: 02/02/2015 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: February 02, 2015 Mr. Thomas Leonard Brejcha Mr. Michael J. DePrimo Ms. Deborah Jane Dewart Ms. Deborah L. Gordon Ms. Sarah S. Prescott Re: Case No. 13-2368, Christopher Armstrong v. Andrew Shirvell Originating Case No. : 2:11-cv-11921 Dear Counsel: The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Amy E. Gigliotti Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7012 cc: Mr. David J. Weaver Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?