Christopher Armstrong v. Andrew Shirvell

Filing

OPINION filed: For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM IN PART, but REVERSE the district court s award of compensatory damages for false light invasion of privacy. We VACATE the district court s judgment and REMAND with instructions to enter judgment in Armstrong s favor for a total of $3.5million. Decision not for publication. Alan E. Norris, Karen Nelson Moore, and Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.

Case: 13-2368

Document: 61-1

Filed: 02/02/2015

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: February 02, 2015

Mr. Thomas Leonard Brejcha
Mr. Michael J. DePrimo
Ms. Deborah Jane Dewart
Ms. Deborah L. Gordon
Ms. Sarah S. Prescott

Re: Case No. 13-2368, Christopher Armstrong v. Andrew Shirvell
Originating Case No. : 2:11-cv-11921
Dear Counsel:
The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Amy E. Gigliotti
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7012
cc: Mr. David J. Weaver
Enclosure
Mandate to issue