Randy Pearce v. Chrysler Grp LLC Pension Plan

Filing

OPINION filed: For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the district court s decision to deny Pearce discovery and strike his reply brief; AFFIRM the grant of summary judgment on Pearce s claim under ERISA 502(a)(1); REVERSE the denial of Pearce s motion to amend to add equitable claims under ERISA 502(a)(3); and REMAND for consideration of the ERISA 502(a)(3) claims. Decision not for publication. Helene N. White, (AUTHORING) and Bernice Bouie Donald, circuit judges; and the Honorable Kathleen McDonald O'Malley, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.

Download PDF
Case: 13-2374 Document: 33-1 Filed: 06/18/2015 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Deborah S. Hunt Clerk 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: June 18, 2015 Mr. William E. Altman Vercruysse, Murray & Calzone 31780 Telegraph Road Suite 200 Bingham Farms, MI 48025 Mr. Lawrence J. Breskin Law Office 615 Griswold Seventh Floor Detroit, MI 48226 Re: Case No. 13-2374, Randy Pearce v. Chrysler Grp LLC Pension Plan Originating Case No. : 2:10-cv-14720 Dear Counsel: The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Amy E. Gigliotti Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7012 cc: Mr. David J. Weaver Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?