David Ayers v. CHMA, et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The qualified-immunity defense, the denial of the preverdict motion for judgment as a matter of law, and the challenge to the sufficiency of evidence are DECLINED to be heard because those arguments have been procedurally forfeited. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is otherwise AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Alice M. Batchelder, Ronald Lee Gilman (AUTHORING), and Julia Smith Gibbons, Circuit Judges.

Case: 13-3413

Document: 73-1

Filed: 12/02/2014

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: December 02, 2014
Mr. Russell Ainsworth
Mr. Jonathan L. Loevy
Loevy & Loevy
312 N. May Street, Suite 100
Chicago, IL 60607
Ms. Jennifer M. Meyer
Mr. Joseph F. Scott
City of Cleveland
Department of Law
601 Lakeside Avenue, Room 106
Cleveland, OH 44114
Re: Case No. 13-3413, David Ayers v. City of Cleveland, et al
Originating Case No. : 1:12-cv-00753
Dear Counsel,
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Cathryn Lovely
Deputy Clerk
cc: Geri M. Smith
Enclosures
Mandate to issue.