Richard Rose v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co, et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s grant of summary judgment to State Farm on Rose s breach of contract and bad faith claims is REVERSED and REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Rose s claim on his Motion to Alter and Amend Judgment under Rule 59(e) is DENIED AS MOOT. Decision for publication. Eugene E. Siler, Jr. (AUTHORING), Ronald Lee Gilman, and Julia Smith Gibbons, Circuit Judges.

Case: 13-3887

Document: 48-3

Filed: 09/08/2014

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-3887

FILED
Sep 08, 2014

RICHARD K. ROSE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,

DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk

v.
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Before: SILER, GILMAN, and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s grant of
summary judgment to State Farm on Rose’s breach of contract and bad faith claims is
REVERSED and REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the
opinion of this court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Rose’s claim on his Motion to Alter and
Amend Judgment under Rule 59(e) is DENIED AS MOOT.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk