Richard Rose v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co, et al
Filing
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s grant of summary judgment to State Farm on Rose s breach of contract and bad faith claims is REVERSED and REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Rose s claim on his Motion to Alter and Amend Judgment under Rule 59(e) is DENIED AS MOOT. Decision for publication. Eugene E. Siler, Jr. (AUTHORING), Ronald Lee Gilman, and Julia Smith Gibbons, Circuit Judges.
Case: 13-3887
Document: 48-3
Filed: 09/08/2014
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-3887
FILED
Sep 08, 2014
RICHARD K. ROSE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
v.
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Before: SILER, GILMAN, and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s grant of
summary judgment to State Farm on Rose’s breach of contract and bad faith claims is
REVERSED and REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the
opinion of this court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Rose’s claim on his Motion to Alter and
Amend Judgment under Rule 59(e) is DENIED AS MOOT.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?