United Pet Supply, Inc. v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, et al


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s entry of summary judgment is REVERSED in part, AFFIRMED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. Decision for publication. Ralph B. Guy, Jr., Alice M. Batchelder, and Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 13-5181 Document: 49-1 Filed: 09/18/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: September 18, 2014 Mr. David E. Harrison Mr. Mark Windle Litchford Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison 633 Chestnut Street, Suite 900 Chattanooga, TN 37450 Mr. James Sheldon Hildebrand Jr. Mr. Mark Andrew Pippenger Leitner, Williams, Dooley & Napolitan 801 Broad Street, Third Floor Chattanooga, TN 37402 Mr. Edmund Scott Sauer Bradley Arant Boult Cummings 1600 Division Street, Suite 700 Nashville, TN 37203 Mr. Scott Burnett Smith Bradley, Arant, Boult & Cummings 200 Clinton Avenue, W., Suite 900 Huntsville, AL 35801 Re: Case No. 13-5181, United Pet Supply, Inc. v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, et al Originating Case Nos. 1:11-cv-00157; 1:11-cv-00193 Dear Counsel, The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case. Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Yours very truly, Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk Cathryn Lovely Deputy Clerk cc: Ms. Debra Poplin Enclosures Mandate to issue.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?