United Pet Supply, Inc. v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, et al
Filing
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s entry of summary judgment is REVERSED in part, AFFIRMED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. Decision for publication. Ralph B. Guy, Jr., Alice M. Batchelder, and Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.
Case: 13-5181
Document: 49-1
Filed: 09/18/2014
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk
Tel. (513) 564-7000
www.ca6.uscourts.gov
Filed: September 18, 2014
Mr. David E. Harrison
Mr. Mark Windle Litchford
Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison
633 Chestnut Street, Suite 900
Chattanooga, TN 37450
Mr. James Sheldon Hildebrand Jr.
Mr. Mark Andrew Pippenger
Leitner, Williams, Dooley & Napolitan
801 Broad Street, Third Floor
Chattanooga, TN 37402
Mr. Edmund Scott Sauer
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings
1600 Division Street, Suite 700
Nashville, TN 37203
Mr. Scott Burnett Smith
Bradley, Arant, Boult & Cummings
200 Clinton Avenue, W., Suite 900
Huntsville, AL 35801
Re:
Case No. 13-5181, United Pet Supply, Inc. v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, et al
Originating Case Nos. 1:11-cv-00157; 1:11-cv-00193
Dear Counsel,
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Cathryn Lovely
Deputy Clerk
cc: Ms. Debra Poplin
Enclosures
Mandate to issue.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?