Liberty Corporate Capital Lim v. Security Safe Outlet, Inc., et al


OPINION filed: We AFFIRM the district court s determination that Liberty had no duty to defend or indemnify SSO. In light of that conclusion, we do not address the parties arguments regarding whether Denninghoff was a covered insured. decision not for publication. Karen Nelson Moore, Circuit Judge; Helene N. White, Circuit Judge and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judge.

Download PDF
Case: 13-5539 Document: 65-1 Filed: 08/15/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: August 15, 2014 Mr. Gregory L. Mast Fields, Howell, Athans & McLaughlin 191 Peachtree Street, N.E. Suite 4600 Atlanta, GA 30303 Mr. Don A. Pisacano Miller, Griffin & Marks 271 W. Short Street Suite 600 Lexington, KY 40507 Re: Case No. 13-5539, Liberty Corporate Capital Limited v. Security Safe Outlet, Inc., et al Originating Case No. : 5:12-cv-00178 Dear Counsel: The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Karen S. Fultz for Robin Johnson Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7039 cc: Mr. Robert R. Carr Mr. David T. Faughn Mr. Carroll M. Redford III Ms. Elizabeth C. Woodford Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?