Liberty Corporate Capital Lim v. Security Safe Outlet, Inc., et al

Filing

OPINION filed: We AFFIRM the district court s determination that Liberty had no duty to defend or indemnify SSO. In light of that conclusion, we do not address the parties arguments regarding whether Denninghoff was a covered insured. decision not for publication. Karen Nelson Moore, Circuit Judge; Helene N. White, Circuit Judge and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judge.

Case: 13-5539

Document: 65-1

Filed: 08/15/2014

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: August 15, 2014

Mr. Gregory L. Mast
Fields, Howell, Athans & McLaughlin
191 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Suite 4600
Atlanta, GA 30303
Mr. Don A. Pisacano
Miller, Griffin & Marks
271 W. Short Street
Suite 600
Lexington, KY 40507
Re: Case No. 13-5539, Liberty Corporate Capital Limited v. Security Safe Outlet, Inc., et al
Originating Case No. : 5:12-cv-00178
Dear Counsel:
The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Karen S. Fultz for Robin Johnson
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7039
cc: Mr. Robert R. Carr
Mr. David T. Faughn
Mr. Carroll M. Redford III
Ms. Elizabeth C. Woodford
Enclosure
Mandate to issue