Kimberly Grice v. West Tennessee Healthcare, et al


Per Curiam OPINION filed : The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, decision not for publication. Jeffrey S. Sutton, Circuit Judge; Richard Allen Griffin, Circuit Judge and Edmund A. Sargus , Jr., U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of OH.

Download PDF
Case: 13-6568 Document: 29-2 Filed: 06/27/2014 Page: 1 NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0466n.06 No. 13-6568 FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT KIMBERLY LARAY GRICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACKSON-MADISON COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL DISTRICT, a/k/a WEST TENNESSEE HEALTHCARE, Defendant-Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Jun 27, 2014 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE BEFORE: SUTTON and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges; and SARGUS, District Judge.* PER CURIAM. Kimberly Grice appeals the district court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We review the district court’s determination de novo. See Keith v. Cnty. of Oakland, 703 F.3d 918, 923 (6th Cir. 2013). After carefully reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, we find no error in the district court’s judgment. The reasoning that supports the judgment was clearly and persuasively articulated by the district court, and our issuance of a detailed written opinion would be unduly duplicative and serve no jurisprudential purpose. We therefore affirm the * The Honorable Edmund A. Sargus, Jr., United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. Case: 13-6568 Document: 29-2 Filed: 06/27/2014 Page: 2 No. 13-6568 Grice v. W. Tenn. Healthcare district court’s judgment for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion. See Grice v. JacksonMadison Cnty. Gen. Hosp. Dist., 981 F. Supp. 2d 719 (W.D. Tenn. 2013). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?