Kimberly Grice v. West Tennessee Healthcare, et al
Per Curiam OPINION filed : The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, decision not for publication. Jeffrey S. Sutton, Circuit Judge; Richard Allen Griffin, Circuit Judge and Edmund A. Sargus , Jr., U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of OH.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 14a0466n.06
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
KIMBERLY LARAY GRICE,
JACKSON-MADISON COUNTY GENERAL
HOSPITAL DISTRICT, a/k/a WEST TENNESSEE
Jun 27, 2014
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
ON APPEAL FROM THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE WESTERN
DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
BEFORE: SUTTON and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges; and SARGUS, District Judge.*
Kimberly Grice appeals the district court’s order granting defendant’s motion for
summary judgment. We review the district court’s determination de novo. See Keith v. Cnty. of
Oakland, 703 F.3d 918, 923 (6th Cir. 2013).
After carefully reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, we find
no error in the district court’s judgment. The reasoning that supports the judgment was clearly
and persuasively articulated by the district court, and our issuance of a detailed written opinion
would be unduly duplicative and serve no jurisprudential purpose. We therefore affirm the
The Honorable Edmund A. Sargus, Jr., United States District Judge for the Southern
District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
Grice v. W. Tenn. Healthcare
district court’s judgment for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion. See Grice v. JacksonMadison Cnty. Gen. Hosp. Dist., 981 F. Supp. 2d 719 (W.D. Tenn. 2013).
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?