USA v. Sean Barry


OPINION filed : We do not address Barry s ineffective assistance of counsel claim as it relates to counsel s failure to oppose the additional $10,000 in punitive restitution, and we AFFIRM the district court s restitution order in all other respects. Decision not for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt, Richard F. Suhrheinrich (AUTHORING), and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judges. *The file stamp has been applied to this signed opinion.--[Edited 05/02/2016 by CL]

Download PDF
Case: 14-1653 Document: 28-1 Filed: 05/02/2016 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Deborah S. Hunt Clerk 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Filed: May 02, 2016 Ms. Tessa K. Hessmiller Office of the U.S. Attorney P.O. Box 208 Grand Rapids, MI 49501 Mr. Jeffrey Paul Nunnari 3349 Executive Parkway, Suite D Toledo, OH 43606 Re: Case No. 14-1653, USA v. Sean Barry Originating Case No. : 1:13-cr-00187-1 Dear Counsel, The Court issued the enclosed opinion today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Cathryn Lovely for Jill Colyer Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7024 cc: Mr. Thomas Dorwin Enclosure Mandate to issue Tel. (513) 564-7000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?