USA v. Sean Barry
Filing
OPINION filed : We do not address Barry s ineffective assistance of counsel claim as it relates to counsel s failure to oppose the additional $10,000 in punitive restitution, and we AFFIRM the district court s restitution order in all other respects. Decision not for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt, Richard F. Suhrheinrich (AUTHORING), and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judges. *The file stamp has been applied to this signed opinion.--[Edited 05/02/2016 by CL]
<![CDATA[
Case: 14-1653
Document: 28-1
Filed: 05/02/2016
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Filed: May 02, 2016
Ms. Tessa K. Hessmiller
Office of the U.S. Attorney
P.O. Box 208
Grand Rapids, MI 49501
Mr. Jeffrey Paul Nunnari
3349 Executive Parkway, Suite D
Toledo, OH 43606
Re: Case No. 14-1653, USA v. Sean Barry
Originating Case No. : 1:13-cr-00187-1
Dear Counsel,
The Court issued the enclosed opinion today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Cathryn Lovely for Jill Colyer
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7024
cc: Mr. Thomas Dorwin
Enclosure
Mandate to issue
Tel. (513) 564-7000
www.ca6.uscourts.gov
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
