Denise Coley, et al v. Lucas County, Ohio, et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The judgment of the district court denying qualified immunity to Defendants Schmeltz, Gray, and Telb regarding Plaintiffs claims of excessive force and failure to train is AFFIRMED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the district court s denial of statutory immunity under Ohio law to Defendant Telb is AFFIRMED. The case is REMANDED to the district court for further expedited proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. Decision for publication. Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Jeffrey S. Sutton, and Jane Branstetter Stranch (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges. [14-3134, 14-3136, 14-3137]

Download PDF
Case: 14-3134 Document: 49-3 Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Nos. 14-3134/3136/3137 DENISE M. COLEY, Administrator of the estate of Carlton L. Benton; DECARLOS L. BENTON; M.L., a minor; CARLA BENTON, Plaintiffs - Appellees, FILED Aug 21, 2015 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk v. LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO, et al., Defendants, JOHN E. GRAY (14-3134); JAY M. SCHMELTZ (14-3136); JAMES A. TELB (14-3137), Defendants - Appellants. Before: SILER, SUTTON, and STRANCH, Circuit Judges. JUDGMENT On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio at Toledo. THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court denying qualified immunity to Defendants Schmeltz, Gray, and Telb regarding Plaintiffs’ claims of excessive force and failure to train is AFFIRMED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the district court’s denial of statutory immunity under Ohio law to Defendant Telb is AFFIRMED. The case is REMANDED to the district court for further expedited proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?