Denise Coley, et al v. Lucas County, Ohio, et al
Filing
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The judgment of the district court denying qualified immunity to Defendants Schmeltz, Gray, and Telb regarding Plaintiffs claims of excessive force and failure to train is AFFIRMED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the district court s denial of statutory immunity under Ohio law to Defendant Telb is AFFIRMED. The case is REMANDED to the district court for further expedited proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. Decision for publication. Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Jeffrey S. Sutton, and Jane Branstetter Stranch (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges. [14-3134, 14-3136, 14-3137]
Case: 14-3134
Document: 49-3
Filed: 08/21/2015
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Nos. 14-3134/3136/3137
DENISE M. COLEY, Administrator of the estate
of Carlton L. Benton; DECARLOS L. BENTON;
M.L., a minor; CARLA BENTON,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
FILED
Aug 21, 2015
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
v.
LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO, et al.,
Defendants,
JOHN E. GRAY (14-3134); JAY M.
SCHMELTZ (14-3136); JAMES A.
TELB (14-3137),
Defendants - Appellants.
Before: SILER, SUTTON, and STRANCH, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Ohio at Toledo.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court
denying qualified immunity to Defendants Schmeltz, Gray, and Telb regarding Plaintiffs’ claims of
excessive force and failure to train is AFFIRMED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the district court’s
denial of statutory immunity under Ohio law to Defendant Telb is AFFIRMED. The case is
REMANDED to the district court for further expedited proceedings consistent with the opinion of this
court.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?