Edward Monroe, et al v. Fts Usa, Llc, et al


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s certification of this case as a collective action and its allowance of representative testimony at trial and the use of an estimated-average approach are AFFIRMED. IT IS FUTHER ORDERED that the district court s calculation of damages is REVERSED and REMANDED for recalculation consistent with the opinion of this court. Decision for publication. Danny J. Boggs, Jeffrey S. Sutton (CONCURRING/DISSENTING), and Jane Branstetter Stranch (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges. *Adam Hansen has been added to the listing of appellee counsel.

Download PDF
Case: 14-6063 Document: 76-1 Filed: 06/21/2017 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Deborah S. Hunt Clerk 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: June 21, 2017 Mr. Bryce W. Ashby Mr. William Benjamin Ryan 1545 Union Avenue Memphis, TN 38104 Mr. Jonathan D. Christman Mr. Colin D. Dougherty Fox Rothschild, P.O. Box 3001 Blue Bell, PA 19422 Mr. Miguel A. Estrada Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 300 Washington, DC 20036 Mr. Adam W. Hansen Apollo Law 400 S. Fourth Street Suite 401M-250 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Mr. William C. Jhaveri-Weeks Goldstein, Borgen, Dardarian & Ho 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1000 Oakland, CA 94612 Ms. Rachhana T. Srey Nichols Kaster 80 S. Eighth Street, Suite 4600 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re: Case No. 14-6063, Edward Monroe, et al v. FTS USA, LLC, et al Originating Case No. : 2:08-cv-02100 Case: 14-6063 Document: 76-1 Filed: 06/21/2017 Page: 2 Dear Counsel, The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case. Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Yours very truly, Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk Cathryn Lovely Deputy Clerk cc: Mr. Thomas M. Gould Enclosures Mandate to issue.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?