USA v. Edward Barker


Per Curiam OPINION filed: We AFFIRM for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge s recommended disposition. Ronald Lee Gilman, Deborah L. Cook, and Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 14-6320 Document: 23-2 Filed: 08/07/2015 Page: 1 NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 15a0560n.06 No. 14-6320 FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Aug 07, 2015 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDWARD A. BARKER Defendant-Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY Before: GILMAN, COOK, and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Edward Barker appeals his conviction for possession of oxycodone with intent to distribute it, arguing that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence that police officers found at his home. We affirm for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s recommended disposition.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?