USA v. Edward Barker

Filing

Per Curiam OPINION filed: We AFFIRM for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge s recommended disposition. Ronald Lee Gilman, Deborah L. Cook, and Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judges.

Case: 14-6320

Document: 23-2

Filed: 08/07/2015

Page: 1

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 15a0560n.06
No. 14-6320

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Aug 07, 2015
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
EDWARD A. BARKER
Defendant-Appellant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ON APPEAL FROM THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY

Before: GILMAN, COOK, and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM. Edward Barker appeals his conviction for possession of oxycodone with
intent to distribute it, arguing that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress
evidence that police officers found at his home. We affirm for the reasons set forth in the
magistrate judge’s recommended disposition.