Anthony Smith, Jr., et al v. Joy Technologies, Inc., et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, and the Smiths' motion to certify a proposed question of law [5348298-2] is DENIED. Decision for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt, Alice M. Batchelder, and Ronald Lee Gilman (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges. [14-6406, 14-6461]

Case: 14-6406

Document: 47-3

Filed: 06/30/2016

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Nos. 14-6406/6461
ANTHONY SMITH, JR. and
LORETTA LYNN SMITH,
Plaintiffs - Appellants (14-6406),
CHARTIS CASUALTY COMPANY,
Intervening Plaintiff - Appellant (14-6406),

FILED
Jun 30, 2016
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk

v.
JOY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., d/b/a Joy
Mining Machinery,
Defendant - Appellee.
Before: MERRITT, BATCHELDER, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Kentucky at London.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED, and the Smiths’ motion to certify a proposed question of law is DENIED.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk