Anthony Smith, Jr., et al v. Joy Technologies, Inc., et al
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, and the Smiths' motion to certify a proposed question of law [5348298-2] is DENIED. Decision for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt, Alice M. Batchelder, and Ronald Lee Gilman (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges. [14-6406, 14-6461]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
ANTHONY SMITH, JR. and
LORETTA LYNN SMITH,
Plaintiffs - Appellants (14-6406),
CHARTIS CASUALTY COMPANY,
Intervening Plaintiff - Appellant (14-6406),
Jun 30, 2016
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
JOY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., d/b/a Joy
Defendant - Appellee.
Before: MERRITT, BATCHELDER, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Kentucky at London.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED, and the Smiths’ motion to certify a proposed question of law is DENIED.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?