USA v. Renata Annese

Filing

OPINION filed : On this record, the district court reasonably concluded that a nine-month upward variance was necessary to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment. 18 U.S.C. 3553(a)(2)(A). Accordingly, we AFFIRM, decision not for publication. R. Guy Cole , Jr., Chief Circuit Judge; Alice M. Batchelder and Deborah L. Cook (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.

Case: 15-1719

Document: 43-1

Filed: 07/19/2016

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: July 19, 2016

Mr. Blake P. Somers
Law Office
114 E. Eighth Street
Cincinnati, OH 45202-0000
Mr. Ronald Matthew Stella
Office of the U.S. Attorney
P.O. Box 208
Grand Rapids, MI 49501
Re: Case No. 15-1719, USA v. Renata Annese
Originating Case No. : 1:14-cr-00206-1
Dear Counsel:
The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Jeanine R. Hance
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7037
cc: Mr. Thomas Dorwin
Enclosure
Mandate to issue