USA v. Renata Annese


OPINION filed : On this record, the district court reasonably concluded that a nine-month upward variance was necessary to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment. 18 U.S.C. 3553(a)(2)(A). Accordingly, we AFFIRM, decision not for publication. R. Guy Cole , Jr., Chief Circuit Judge; Alice M. Batchelder and Deborah L. Cook (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 15-1719 Document: 43-1 Filed: 07/19/2016 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: July 19, 2016 Mr. Blake P. Somers Law Office 114 E. Eighth Street Cincinnati, OH 45202-0000 Mr. Ronald Matthew Stella Office of the U.S. Attorney P.O. Box 208 Grand Rapids, MI 49501 Re: Case No. 15-1719, USA v. Renata Annese Originating Case No. : 1:14-cr-00206-1 Dear Counsel: The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Jeanine R. Hance Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7037 cc: Mr. Thomas Dorwin Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?