Peter Bormuth v. County of Jackson


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s grant of summary judgment to the County of Jackson is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for entry of summary judgment in favor of Peter Bormuth and for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. Decision for publication. Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING), Richard Allen Griffin (DISSENTING), and Jane Branstetter Stranch, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 15-1869 Document: 29-1 Filed: 02/15/2017 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Deborah S. Hunt Clerk 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: February 15, 2017 Mr. Richard Brian Katskee Americans United for Separation of Church and State 1310 L Street, N.W., Suite 200 Washington, DC 20005 Mr. Richard D. McNulty Cohl, Stoker & Toskey 601 N. Capitol Avenue Lansing, MI 48933 Re: Case No. 15-1869, Peter Bormuth v. County of Jackson Originating Case No. : 2:13-cv-13726 Dear Counsel, The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case. Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Yours very truly, Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk Cathryn Lovely Deputy Clerk cc: Mr. Peter Carl Bormuth Mr. David J. Weaver Enclosures Mandate to issue.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?