Jack Reese, et al v. CNH Industrial N.V., et al
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : It is ORDERED that the district court s vesting determination is AFFIRMED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case is REMANDED to the district court with instructions to properly weigh the costs and the benefits of the proposed plan in accordance with Reese II. Decision for publication. Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING), Jeffrey S. Sutton (DISSENTING), and Bernice Bouie Donald (CONCURRING IN THE JUDGMENT), Circuit Judges.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
JACK REESE; FRANCES ELAINE PIDDE;
JAMES CICHANOFSKY; ROGER MILLER;
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
Apr 20, 2017
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
CNH INDUSTRIAL N.V.; CNH INDUSTRIAL
Defendants - Appellants.
Before: GIBBONS, SUTTON, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by
IN CONSIDERATION THEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s
vesting determination is AFFIRMED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case is
REMANDED to the district court with instructions to properly weigh the costs and the
benefits of the proposed plan in accordance with Reese II.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?