Russell Kiser v. Lili Reitz, et al
Filing
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s dismissal of Kiser s procedural-due-process claim is AFFIRMED, its dismissal of his First Amendment, substantive-due-process, and equal-protections claims is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. Decision for publication. Danny J. Boggs (AUTHORING) and Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judges; and William H. Stafford, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Florida, sitting by designation.
Case: 15-3335
Document: 17-3
Filed: 08/05/2016
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-3335
RUSSELL KISER, D.D.S., M.S.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
FILED
Aug 05, 2016
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
v.
HARRY KAMDAR, Board Executive Director;
MARYBETH D. SHAFFER; CONSTANCE F.
CLARK; W. CHRIS HANNERS; ASHOK DAS;
MARTIN CHAMBERS; PATRICIA GUTTMAN;
CHARLES SMITH; JEAN HUBER; SUSAN
JOHNSTON; ANN AQUILLO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Before: BOGGS and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges; and STAFFORD, District Judge.
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s dismissal of Kiser’s
procedural-due-process claim is AFFIRMED, its dismissal of his First Amendment, substantive-dueprocess, and equal-protections claims is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further
proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?