USA, et al v. Muskingum Watershed Conservanc


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s dismissal of Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District s claims is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Ralph B. Guy, Jr.,Danny J. Boggs (AUTHORING), and Karen Nelson Moore (DISSENTING), Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 15-4406 Document: 28-3 Filed: 11/21/2016 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 15-4406 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. LEATRA HARPER, STEVEN JANSTO, and LESLIE HARPER, Relators - Appellants, FILED Nov 21, 2016 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk v. MUSKINGUM WATERSHED CONSERVANCY DISTRICT, Defendant - Appellee. Before: GUY, BOGGS, and MOORE, Circuit Judges. JUDGMENT On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio at Akron. THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was submitted on the briefs without oral argument. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s dismissal of Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District’s claims is AFFIRMED. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT ____________________________________ Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?