Daniel Moody v. MI Gaming Control Bd, et al


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court s dismissal of Daniel Moody s First Amendment retaliation claim for lack of standing is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. R. Guy Cole, Jr., Chief Judge; Danny J. Boggs and Eugene E. Siler, Jr. (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges. *The filing date on the opinion has been corrected.--[Edited 02/02/2017 by CL]

Download PDF
Case: 16-1155 Document: 27-2 Filed: 02/02/2017 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1155 DANIEL MOODY, Plaintiff - Appellant, FILED Feb 02, 2017 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk v. MICHIGAN GAMING CONTROL BOARD; SCOTT MCLEAY; STEVEN J. FERRARI; AL ERNST; NORMA COLE; ERIC PERTINNEN; JIM CURRAN; RICHARD KALM; JOHN LESSNAU, Defendants - Appellees. Before: COLE, Chief Judge; BOGGS and SILER, Circuit Judges. JUDGMENT On Appeal From the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Ann Arbor. THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s dismissal of Daniel Moody’s First Amendment retaliation claim for lack of standing is AFFIRMED. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT ____________________________________ Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?